VPN4ALL

Child Porn

Child porn is the main card played by the enemies of privacy and freedom of speech in order to bring down websites, filter the internet, question people, implement personal restrictions on citizens and other stomping on civil liberties with total impunity.

DECEPTION ONE:
“Hundreds of children rescued from abuse”

Examples of rescued children:

Australian man was convicted of child porn posession 5th December 2008 as judge says he had downloaded cartoons of the The Simpsons doing sex.

Wikipedia webpage blocked by the United Kingdom 8th December 2008 claiming a 1976 original album cover of German heavy metal band Scorpions is child porn.

Frank McCoy arrested in the US 13th January 2007 and charged with distributing obscene material involving child porn text stories posted to alt.sex.stories 15 years ago.

Is this child pornography?
Is this child pornography?

DECEPTION TWO:
There are 2.6 billion of child porn images

Since child porn images are illegal nobody can know for sure how many there are unless it is by planting them themselves on the internet.

Any claim of an exact number of child porn images is either a lie or an admission that some security agencies know far too well about it because they have planted them from their untraceable and government protected computers in the first place.

DECEPTION THREE:
Child pornography a 20 billion dollar business

The cost of a social worker= $30.000 dollars a year

The cost of a police officer= $40.000 dollars a year

The cost of a police inspector=$75.000 dollars a year

The cost of a politician=$100.000 a year

The cost of a  “charity worker” =$30.000 a year

The cost of child porn conferences=$100.000 a year

The cost of child pornography internet filters=$1.000.000 a year

The cost of bizarre lavish anti child porn budget=+$1.000.000.000

The major costs of child pornography are the agencies and people in charge of going after it. Most child pornography is underground there is no multimillion Hollywood studio producing it as some want you to believe.

DECEPTIONS TARGET:

By creating fictitious enemies dark government agencies working in the background increase their budget and powers to arrest and interrogate citizens.

By playing the child porn card it is possible to curtail all kind of freedoms without any opposition. In May 2008 the United Kingdom made illegal the posession of cartoons, with this law alone millions of new child porn images could now be counted and recorded and new people arrested.

In the past years Australia has raided Bill Henson art gallery, the FBI has raided Jock Sturges art gallery and the UK has raided Sir Elton John photography exhibition for showing “Klara and Edda belly-dancing”, by famous American photographer Nan Goldin, at the time it was claimed that was all filthy child porn.

All those people have something in common, after the raids not a single one of them was ever convicted of child porn but by then child pornography fear had already been disseminated to the population.

Other fake child porn

Frank McCoy ASSTR webpage containing sex stories with children, as of 8th December 2008 he is now awaiting trial in the US and charged with “obscenity” for writing them:

http://www.asstr.org/~Frank_McCoy/

Famous photographers like Sally Mann for photographying her own kids nude and Jock Sturges for publishing books with innocent pictures of  nudist kids have had to put up with the child porn lies.

Lolicon and Shotacon are illegal in some countries and wrongly classified as child porn. Although Google will find it very quickly as its posession and distribution remains legal in most European countries (not the UK) and Japan.

For more information see:

Legal status of cartoon pornography depicting minors

Films falsely accused of child porn just because of some SECONDS of child nudity:

Piccole labbra (1978) – Little Lips

La locanda della maladolescenza (1980) – Maladolescenza

Barnens ö (The Children’s Island) (1980)

Pixote (1981)

Robby (1968)

The Genesis Children (1972)

Even  I mavri Emmanouella (1979) – Emmanuelle Queen of Sados was edited by the censors in the US because of a short scene where a 13 year old girl showers nude (the European version was released unedited).

Others accused of child pornography by the witch hunters are Purenudism and some NN child modelling sites and even Kawaii15 ( forum for Japanese Junior Idols U-15), Flatchan (Lolicon & Shotacon),   iChan (Lolicon & Shotacon), NudistVideoClub (family nudism) Naturist Freedom , Candid-HD (nudist) and a long etc, including Usenet groups trading pictures of NN child models, but so far no charges have ever been brought against any them.

The majority of child porn out there is bogus, but we can not lie ourselves, real child pornography also exists.

As example find  below some child pornography convictions. Bear in mind that as the so called child porn photos can not be reproduced it is impossible to exactly establish what kind of images they had in their power other than by trusting what the court papers say, but, do you trust your Government?

-Convicted of sharing child porn in Usenet

-Frank McCoy ASSTR child porn arrest

-Convicted of sex with 15yo in Costa Rica

-Convicted for sharing child porn over P2P

-Convicted after family member spots him

-Convicted for uploading child porn from home IP

-Acquitted after police fails to crack his encrypted HDD

6 thoughts on “Child Porn”

  1. While I don’t condone child pornography and don’t deny its existence, it is true that there is a lot of hysteria surrounding the issue, and that a lot of this hysteria is purposely generated by the government and MSM (mainstream media) to serve as pretext to take our liberties away. The fact is, all the laws that are necessary to combat genuine child pornography have been on the books for decades and new ones aren’t needed.

    Frankly, if Western societies were truly interested in protecting the welfare of children, it wouldn’t be letting homosexual couples adopt. Clearly there is something else at work here than a concern for children’s well-being.

  2. Well, I think the Government knows far well that if they want to pass a law that is privacy/censorship invasive all they have to do is to say “child protection”, and the law will be passed.

  3. I was wondering if you know if it’s possible to get in trouble for describing or drawing one’s own youthful sexual escapades. Lately, I’ve been feeling that I’ve seen so many negative messages aimed at young women I feel almost compelled to speak out against them. The most obvious, and I think compelling way, would be to talk about how wonderful my own experiences were. Twenty years later, I not only do not regret them, they are some of my fondest memories and I wouldn’t trade them for anything. I know I’ll offend some people, but I’m wondering how much so and what the consequences might be.

  4. Hello Jacqueline,

    Laws are all different around the World, and there is not a global answer to your question.

    I will assume from your IP that you live in the US, the following advice is therefore for US residents only.

    If you write a sex story describing illegal actions (ie underage sex) and you make it clear that it is based on real facts, you could get in serious trouble, if I was you I would make a small disclaimer on the heading saying “based on fiction”, and that is it.

    Fiction sex stories with children without pictures can not be prosecuted under US child porn laws, but they could be prosecuted under US obscenity laws, even if these cases are rare, it has happened in the past, it is not impossible.

    If you want to play it safe, your best bet is to submit your fiction sex story to a website for them to publish it for you.

    A place that will take readers submissions of child sex stories is Leslita (Lesbian Lolita) for example:

    http://www.asstr.org/~leslita

    Another place where they accept reader submissions of child sex stories is Puericil (little boys only):

    http://www.asstr.org/~puericil/

    You could also post it on Usenet at group:

    alt.sex.stories.moderated

    Regarding child sex drawings, also known as Lolicon, although easy to find, this is a grey matter in the US, there has been some prosecutions over this in the past using obscenity laws, not child porn laws, but I would definitely be extremely careful about it.

    If you fear your computer can one day be stolen and your inner secrets revealed, then download Truecrypt (http://www.truecrypt.org) and use full disk encryption.

    Disclaimer: These are my personal estimations, I am not a lawyer.

  5. Thanks for getting back to me. I appreciate your input.

    Actually, I haven’t done anything illegal, so I’m not worried about the government, just hyperactive moralists.

    I originally found this site because I wanted to find out if it was possible to put up a website without having it found by the average nosy person. There are three reasons that I want anonymity when discussing my sexual past. I don’t want to make religious people violently angry. Since you’re in the UK, you may be unaware that a while ago a man murdered women in an exercise class after reading about a girl’s sexual adventures online. Also, I don’t want my sexual history to be the first thing that comes up if someone Googles my name. Lastly, there’s the possibility of stalkers.

    Really, worrying about this feels more like vanity than paranoia because I’ll probably be lucky if anyone reads it at all.

  6. …just go to a lolicon site… it’s legal, nobody is harmed, and if your into that kind of thing, then ur urges will go away. it’s basically anime child porn if anybody is wondering…

Comments are closed.

Security for the paranoid